<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>pseudopost.org &#187; Projekte</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pseudopost.org/archives/category/projekte/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pseudopost.org</link>
	<description>awaiting inspiration since 2001</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 21:26:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Twitter Census vs. TwittPoll</title>
		<link>http://pseudopost.org/archives/2008/01/twittercensus-vs-twittpoll/</link>
		<comments>http://pseudopost.org/archives/2008/01/twittercensus-vs-twittpoll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netzwelt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projekte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pseudopost.org/archives/2008/01/twittercensus-vs-twittpoll/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two new and shiny poll tools for the twitter network appeared in the last weeks.  One is my twitter census and the other one is&#8230; the other one, no it&#8217;s twittpoll.com, of course ;)
If you made up your mind on which tool you like better, please participate in the shootout-poll (i.e. &#8220;@hellp twittercensus #pollshootout&#8220;).
Here&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two new and shiny poll tools for the twitter network appeared in the last weeks.  One is my <a href="http://twittercensus.com/">twitter census</a> and the other one is&#8230; the other one, no it&#8217;s <a href="http://twittpoll.com/">twittpoll.com</a>, of course ;)</p>
<p>If you made up your mind on which tool you like better, please <a href="http://twittercensus.com/hellp-pollshootout/">participate in the shootout-poll</a> (i.e. &#8220;<code>@hellp twittercensus #pollshootout</code>&#8220;).</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my don&#8217;t-be-to-biased side-by-side comparison of both [Constantly <strong>updated</strong>.]:</p>
<h3>Is primarily for&#8230;</h3>
<p>TC: quick, real-time personal polls among my friends/followers.</p>
<p>TP: comprehensive polls among all twitter folks.</p>
<h3>Addresses to&#8230;</h3>
<p>TC: your followers. Expect about 0-20 replies in 10 minutes.</p>
<p>TP: all twitterati. Expect about 50-1000 replies in 24 hours.</p>
<h3>Let&#8217;s you create polls instantly&#8230;</h3>
<p>TC: yes.</p>
<p>TP: no.</p>
<h3>The author of the poll gets instant feedback, through all interfaces Twitter offers&#8230;</h3>
<p>TC: yes.</p>
<p>TP: no.</p>
<h3>Has a slightly complicated syntax to learn&#8230;</h3>
<p>TC: yes.</p>
<p>TP: no.</p>
<h3>Accepts polls with more than two choices&#8230;</h3>
<p>TC: yes.</p>
<p>TP: no.</p>
<h3>Uses Twitter as&#8230;</h3>
<p>TC: interface for all its functions.</p>
<p>TP: promotion tool only.</p>
<h3>Is technically&#8230;</h3>
<p>TC: somewhat challenging and (unfortunately) error-prone.</p>
<p>TP: simple, 2-choice-only, but less interactive.</p>
<h3>Has a name&#8230;</h3>
<p>TC: that would fit perfectly to twittpoll.</p>
<p>TP: that would fit perfectly to twitter census.</p>
<p>So maybe both projects should exchange names and live peacefully side by side :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pseudopost.org/archives/2008/01/twittercensus-vs-twittpoll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

